Skip to content

The news behind the software that runs companies, explained for everyone.

Security

Epic stopped building new products for six weeks. An AI model found the flaws.

Epic Systems, whose MyChart software holds 320 million patient records, paused product development for six weeks to fix security flaws, TechCrunch reported on Friday.

ERP LEADERS news desk · · First reported by TechCrunch · Edition no. 26

Founder and chief executive Judy Faulkner disclosed the pause to Modern Healthcare last month.

Epic's security chief told The New York Times that "some customer configurations of MyChart could allow outsiders to access patient records without recording any intrusion in the software's logs." According to TechCrunch, Anthropic's security model Mythos found the flaws while deployed at Epic.

Epic did not respond to TechCrunch's request for comment. The report does not say whether anyone accessed patient records.

For hospitals reviewing exposure, the gap is in the logs: the report does not say whether they have other records, such as network or sign-in logs, that could show access before the fix.

Image: AI-generated.

Sources

Spotted an error? Tell us. Every correction is logged on Standards.

Your reading room

Companies in this story

Our file on Anthropic

  1. 7 OctFiled later

    Analysts said Claude subscribers use 42% of Anthropic's computing. They pay 10% of sales.

  2. 6 OctFiled later

    Microsoft planned $1 billion for employees using Claude. Then it cut over a third.

  3. 1 Oct

    Anthropic said robots could do most physical tasks. They're cost-competitive on 0.3%.

  4. 1 Oct

    Trump ordered federal agencies to rename AI. The new word is Super Intelligence.

  5. 30 Sept

    Anthropic said Sonnet 5.5 cut task costs up to 30%.

All 29 Anthropic stories

For your next steering committee

Questions for your own programme. They are not findings about any company in this story.

  1. 1Ask which design decisions in your programme would be expensive to reverse, and when each was last reviewed.
  2. 2Ask which expected benefits change if the implementation approach changes.
  3. 3Ask who owns a decision to change course, and where it would be recorded.

Issue 01 of the ERP LEADERS brief puts a timeline, the three-number review and six questions on one page. Read issue 01

Founding reader view is on in this browser. It is a reading view, not secure access. Print the working sheet

Founding reader

Welcome back. · Issue 01

1 comment under this story on LinkedIn. Read the discussion

Keep reading

The ERP LEADERS brief Subscribe